记者：FIFA已驳回尼日利亚举报，维持此前比赛结果不变（记者：FIFA驳回尼日利亚申诉，比赛结果维持不变）

Clarifying user intent

I need to respond to the user, who presented a sentence in Chinese about FIFA rejecting Nigeria's complaint about a match result. It's not clear if they're asking for more information, a summary, or something else. Since this is about current events, I can't assume understanding here. My knowledge cutoff is in October 2024, and the date is December 29, 2025, so this info might be recent. I should ask if they want a summary, source, or verification instead!Asking for user clarification

The user didn't specifically ask me to fetch information, so it makes sense to clarify what they want. I should offer a brief, neutral paraphrase and ask if they need context, details, or specifics about the match. It might be helpful to say something like, "Got it! Would you like a quick summary, background, or source links?" Since there might be multiple Nigeria protests, asking for the specific tournament and date (like AFCON or U17) is important. I'll keep the tone collaborative and concise!Preparing a thoughtful response

I’ll start by acknowledging the headline the user provided. Then, I need to ask what they specifically need—whether they want confirmation, translation, or a deeper explanation. I can offer quick context by explaining that "驳回举报" means the complaint was dismissed, and the match result stands without any replay or sanctions. If they are looking for specifics, I’ll ask for details like the tournament, opponent, date, or the nature of the alleged infraction. Since the user is Chinese, I should respond in their language!